I landed my dream PhD – and it turned into a nightmare

The Guardian | 6 January 2017 | Academics Anonymous
Friday 13 January 2017
by  antonin

Cutting-edge research, international collaboration and full funding: the project sounded too good to be true. It was.

I signed up for a PhD that should have marked the start of an amazing career – it was a fully-funded position as part of an exciting project that I was enthusiastic to work on. In fact, this decision has done anything but help my career.

I had been in the UK higher education system for five years at that point, having undertaken both my undergraduate and master’s degrees at UK universities. I was lured in by the prospects this PhD offered: international work experience within an exciting research team and the opportunity to develop valuable skills in my field, using cutting-edge techniques. To top it all off, I would get a monthly salary, tuition fees waived, and expenses for conferences, laboratory work and travel would all be covered.

Foolishly, I did very little research on my supervisors, thinking that nothing could go wrong with a project funded by a well-known organisation in one of UK’s leading universities. I was very wrong.

On my arrival, I discovered that my supervisor did not have much knowledge in my area – having not worked directly on it before – and I was the first PhD student they had ever had.

None of the equipment I was supposedly going to learn to use (as mentioned in the original advertisement) was in place. I was left to work with outdated methods that weren’t beneficial to the project or my development. When I raised these issues, I was told that these methods were more financially sustainable and that the university could not invest in the equipment at the moment.

To make matters worse, international collaboration was never made possible. In fact, it was actively discouraged on several occasions.

I tried numerous times to address these issues with my supervisors, since I was getting worried about the prospects for my PhD. They didn’t seem interested. After more than a year of this situation, I told them that I was extremely unhappy with the project and that things needed to change.

They denied my concerns. The equipment was not necessary for my research, they said, and the statements and opportunities mentioned in the original proposal were not written in stone. I was referred to the departmental tutor for “advice”, but was instead told to decide whether I wanted to stay or quit. I was offered no support in trying to resolve any of the issues that I had raised.

I contacted my funding body about the situation. I hoped that this would spark some interest in trying to find a solution so I would be able to continue; it said there was not much it could do. It seemed that the organisation had given its money to a project that couldn’t have worked in the way it was intended.

I had no choice but to quit. My issues were not recognised as valid by the department, my supervisors or the university – I later found out that my withdrawal had been put down to “personal and health issues”, which made me feel even worse.

This experience has taught me a lot about how universities operate – I have learned these lessons the hard way. The best advice I can offer to anyone considering a PhD is to do a lot of research before starting. Get to know your supervisor’s area of expertise, the university and the department. Visit the university to get an idea of the facilities that are available. Ask as many questions as you can before you start. Know your rights. Don’t trust that you will be given what you are promised. Be wary about signing up to something that seems too good to be true.

The damage this has inflicted on my career and my ambition is immense. It made me lose my motivation and passion for a subject that I loved. I just hope that sharing my experience means more will be done in the future to check projects before they are funded so that cases like mine cannot happen again.


Read on The Guardian

Picture credit: ‘The damage this has inflicted on my career and my ambition is immense. It made me lose my motivation and passion for a subject that I loved.’ Photograph: Alamy



commentaires article

Agenda

<<

2017

 

<<

Février

 

Aujourd'hui

LuMaMeJeVeSaDi
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272812345
Aucun évènement à venir les 2 prochains mois

News items

C. Villani : "on arrive à se sentir étouffé"

dimanche 5 février

[Interview de C. Villani, The Conversation, 30/01/2017]
Revenons en France avec une question beaucoup plus terre à terre : un jeune docteur en mathématique qui vient d’enchaîner un ou deux postdoc à l’étranger décroche un poste de chargé de recherche ou de maître de conférence. Il débute alors sa carrière avec un salaire de 1 800 euros net par mois. Comment qualifier cette situation et comment l’améliorer pour créer des vocations ?

C.V. : Malgré ce salaire peu reluisant, le statut du CNRS reste attractif pour sa grande liberté. Si l’on veut garder son attrait à la profession, il est important de travailler sur le reste : en premier lieu, limiter les règles, les contraintes, les rapports. Je donnerai un exemple parmi quantité : le CNRS vient de décider qu’il refuse tout remboursement des missions effectuées dans un contexte d’économie partagée : pas de remboursement de logement Airbnb, ni de trajet BlaBlaCar… De petites contraintes en petites contraintes, on arrive à se sentir étouffé. Le simple sentiment d’être respecté et de ne pas avoir à lutter pour son budget, par ailleurs, pourra jouer beaucoup. Par ailleurs, il est certain qu’une revalorisation salariale ou d’autres avantages pour les débuts de carrière seront bienvenus.

Les universités vont continuer à geler des postes en 2017

lundi 28 novembre 2016

La crise budgétaire des universités françaises continue depuis leur passage à l’ "autonomie" avec comme conséquence directe l’utilisation de la masse comme variable d’ajustement. Comment diminuer la masse salarial ? Embaucher des contractuels au lieu de titulaires, demander et ne pas payer des heures supplémentaires aux enseignants-chercheurs titulaires, supprimer des postes d’ATER et des contrats doctoraux ou encore geler des postes. Mais que signifie "geler des postes" ? Il s’agit de ne pas ouvrir à candidature des postes de titulaires ouverts par le ministères. Depuis 2009, 11.000 postes ont été gelés dans les universités dont 1200 les cinq dernières années. En 2017, ce processus continuera dans de nombreuses universités : Paris 1, Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Reims, Paris-Est Créteil, Dijon, Orléans, Brest, Paris 8, Bordeaux 3, Artois, Bretagne-Sud, Lyon 3, Limoges, Pau, Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée.

New Analysis of Employment Outcomes for Ph.D.s in Canada

Thursday 5 February 2015

An analysis of where Canada’s Ph.D.-holders are employed finds that just 18.6 percent are employed as full-time university professors. The analysis from the Conference Board of Canada finds that nearly 40 percent of Ph.D.s are employed in higher education in some capacity, but many are in temporary or transitional positions. The other three-fifths are employed in diverse careers in industry, government and non-governmental organizations: “Indeed, employment in diverse, non-academic careers is the norm, not the exception, for Ph.D.s in Canada.” - Inside Higher Edu, January 8, 2015

[Sweden] New legislation to help foreign postgraduates stay on

Sunday 27 April 2014

On 1 July this year, new legislation will come into force in Sweden that includes measures which will make it considerably easier for foreign doctoral candidates and students to stay and work in the country after graduating.

An agreement between the outgoing Alliance government and the Swedish Green party will secure a majority vote for the proposal in the parliament. (...) – University World News, by Jan Petter Myklebust, 21 March 2014 Issue No:312

On the Web : Full news here

US : Dwindling tenure posts

vendredi 18 avril 2014

Tenure is dying out at US universities.

The proportion of non-tenure-track and non-tenured faculty posts continues to rise across all US institutions, finds a report by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) in Washington DC. Losing Focus : The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 201314 surveyed 1,159 public and private US institutions and found that the overall proportion of assistant professors in non-tenure-track posts was 23.4 for 201314, compared with 20.8 in 201011. Dwindling tenured and tenure-track posts threaten the ability of scientists to conduct research without interference from funders or administrators, says John Curtis, the report’s lead author and director of research and public policy for the AAUP. - Nature, 508, 277, 09 April 2014

Sur le Web : Read on nature.com
Soutenir par un don